3招搞定《圣诞故事读书笔记》写作。(精选5篇)
更新日期:2025-09-09 19:14

写作核心提示:
写一篇关于圣诞故事读书笔记的作文,需要注意以下几个关键事项,以确保你的作文内容充实、结构清晰、表达得当:
1. "明确核心要素:"
"选定的圣诞故事:" 首先要清晰说明你读了哪本(或哪个)圣诞故事。是经典的《圣诞颂歌》?是《小妇人》中的圣诞章节?还是其他现代或地方性的圣诞故事?这是基础。
"故事的基本情节:" 简要概括故事的主要内容和情节发展,让读者对故事有基本了解。但注意,笔记的重点不是复述全文,而是分析和反思。
2. "深入分析与思考(笔记的核心):"
"主题与寓意:" 这是读书笔记最重要的部分。思考故事想要传达什么关于圣诞节的核心信息?是关于爱、家庭、牺牲、希望、慈善、宽恕、人性的温暖,还是批判与反思(比如《圣诞颂歌》中对贪婪和悔改的警示)?用具体的情节或人物来支撑你的观点。
"人物分析:" 哪些人物给你留下了深刻印象?他们的性格特点是什么?他们在故事中扮演了什么角色?他们的行为或转变体现了什么?作者是如何塑造这些人物的?
"象征意义:" 圣诞节本身以及故事中可能出现的象征物(如圣诞树、礼物、蜡烛、雪、特定的食物等
朗读版:1914圣诞停火,他们的手没有扣扳机——我看了看面前的键盘 | CGTN周末随笔
1914年12月24日,在一片“诡异的寂静”之中,现代战争史上最悲伤的奇迹沿着第一次世界大战“西线”开始了。枪声消失了。新掘的战壕里,士兵面对突如其来的寂静无所适从,因为他们已经习惯了炮火的震耳欲聋。入夜,从不远处敌人的防线中传来的第一次不是子弹破空的尖叫,而是圣诞颂歌,不同的语言,同样的曲调。从寂静到颂歌,在交战双方的档案中均有记载。战后数十年,免于战火的信件、日记和老兵的口述零零碎碎地拼起了“1914圣诞停火”的故事线。在参战国纷纷明确拒绝圣诞节停火的建议之后,沿“西线”对垒的近10万人“不约而同”地选择放下了武器,走出战壕,和拥有同样信仰的敌人一起庆祝同一个节日。历史的全景则多少有些暗淡。在1914年的那个冬天,无数复杂的因素交织在一起,才让和平意外得以喘息。战争初期,协约国和同盟国双方都对战事进程有着不切实际的自信,走出战壕与敌人寒暄的士兵乐观地认为自己很快就可以回家;此外,对于军官的不满让普通士兵借机公开违抗不准通敌的命令…今人唯一可以庆幸的是,在所有可能的心理因素背后,人性对和平的渴望仍然是“1914圣诞停火”的核心诱因。“1914圣诞停火”最大的悲哀,在于它止步于1914年。那个圣诞节的寂静很快便被索姆河和凡尔登的杀戮声所填满。成功避免了第三次世界大战的今天,人类在历史的进程中终于长大了一点点。但战火硝烟还在,在炮声传不到我们耳边的地方。追求世界和平是个大词,在我们岁月静好的手机电脑屏幕上,好像有些装不下。那就让我们先追求身边的和平吧,在火药味儿越来越浓的社交网路上。不再因为反转不断、真假难辨的故事怒发冲冠、不再因为与我们相左的意见而恶语相向、不再因为喜欢不同的明星而彼此诋毁中伤——不再因为一个感染了新冠的姑娘是否去过夜店而判断她的人品是好是坏。就像在那场模糊掉正义的帝国主义征伐中把枪放下的士兵,我们也可以选择在网络暴力失控前暂时放下键盘,让流量重归平和。
Sidelines | Christmas E-Armistice
Sidelines is a column by CGTN's Social Media Desk
In the world of social media, hardly a day would pass by without a skirmish breaking out about something somewhere.An unknowing transmitter of COVID-19 accidentally set the Chinese social media off last week. She became the bull's eye of online trolling after stopping by several nightclubs before being diagnosed. After local police cleared her name of any wrongdoing, hate speech changed direction, blaming the "foolhardy people like her" for the lingering epidemic. A war of words ensued between the critics and lovers of modern lifestyle.Social media seems to possess the power of having us constantly on the edge of our seats, with stories pandering into our whims. First, we have ourselves to blame. Human brain functions in favor of coherent narrative, where there is only fragmented information, and ideas that sympathize with our own. A prejudice firmly formed in the head is the shortest track on which our train of thought charges to fruition.The pressure from a long day at work or months of being in a lockdown could trigger the mental shortcut. The anonymity with social media commentary is also complicit in our shooting from the hip. Moreover, while the consequences of the ill-judged verdicts stay on, we turn away, vanishing among a group of like-minded people and forget.There are people who know how to make the best use of our weakness. If a network's business lifeline is data traffic, it would ache the platform to rein in content conducive to swelling stream. The persistence of fake news is an example. Dressed in provocative title and picture, the false stories appeal more strongly to our emotions, which act faster than reasoning in our neuro system, to push up click-through rate. A click or pause at your post means one step ahead of your competitors in the cut-throat competition for viewer's time and attention. Whatever the prize of that may be. The social media players like Donald Trump, the outgoing U.S. president, know this. Divisive content can work to achieve hits. Audiences are drawn to factually problematic posts by any strong emotions, disgust, anger or excitement, to the detriment of other contents and their makers.The risk of social media bullying and trolling could increase in the loop – we read things that reinforce our own belief and belittle others, turning short-tempered, reading more and becoming more impatient with people we disagree with.Regulating could be a delicate dance. Social media, by and large, has emerged as the most far-reaching and inclusive public sphere. Neither governments nor the users want to choke it with heavy hands. Compared to leaving the networks to their own device, holding them responsible for the content appearing on their platforms seems a more plausible option.What can we do to survive and spare others the emotional trap? A simple but profound lesson is from the Christmas Truce in 1914.An estimate of 100,000 soldiers along the Western Frontline of World War I came to hold their fires in almost miraculous spontaneity at the first Christmas of the four-year-long Armageddon.Surviving letters, diaries and oral accounts from witnesses help piecing together a vast picture rich in details but short of causality. For the benefit of this column, an important detail that comes out is how it began: guns falling quiet as the Christmas eve came down the battlefields.It was an "eerie sound of silence" after months of "hissing, cracking and whining of bullets in flight, machine-gun fire," recalled Alfred Anderson, a Scottish World War I veteran in 2004.Haltingly throughout the night into the next morning, carols emerging across the trenches in German as well as English broke the silence, instead of the roar of canons – a detail shared by many reports of the truce.Every history textbook record what followed. Emboldened soldiers clambered from gorges to exchange festival greetings with enemies, sharing cigarettes, food and alcohol. Burial of bodies scattering on the no-man's land for weeks. Even games of football between opposing soldiers.Later on, research found several historical and psychological factors at work behind the truce. Not all of them may attest to humanity's absolute command over depravity, but together they could drive towards the same sentiment: the war machine should be switched off, and people should go home.If the neuroscience findings of the past half century are not kidding us, all we need to do to snuff the fuse leading to a potential social media shouting campaign around something that's probably factually problematic is to pause and think quietly. Holding our keyboards like the soldiers putting down their rifles in the WWI trenches on 1914 Christmas Day. In the course of a minute, let us ignore the exclamation marks in the headlines and let the reasoning kick in, chewing the lines to the bone to see if they are worth the salt.It was the first Christmas during the "war that ends all wars" (what an irony in retrospect). Three more were to come in bloodshed and the fourth with trauma. At least 22 million lives were lost by the end. The 1914 Christmas Truce tells us two things: it could happen as well as what would happen when it failed to hold.Social media has become a battlefield, some people say. But, with a little pause before typing, hopefully we can make it look a lot less like one.For those who are celebrating, CGTN Social Media Desk wishes you a merry Christmas.随笔:圣诞感言
圣诞感言
不几天又到圣诞节了,虽然圣诞节也是洋节,我也是不大留心这洋节的,但因自己学生时代起也作兴过,故而每逢圣诞节,还是有所感觉的。今年这感觉尤其强烈,便想感言几句。
老实说,先前对圣诞节是很不满意的。总觉得它太单薄,轰轰烈烈的刚开头,便急匆匆的煞了尾,就象写搞笑书法,浓浓的起了一笔,以为要浓墨重彩的写下去,结果匆匆的就丢笔而罢,哪有中国的节日那样有头有尾,有引子、有余音,中规中矩呢!现在呢,这洋节除学生们还很兴奋,商家也想着把它躁动成商机外,同样是从当年热衷这洋节的学生而来的成了年的人对此却变得漠然,可有可无的渡过着,自己也属这例。
然而,年岁是添了些,今年就格外翻然有悟。觉得这节和中国的节深层里似乎有些不同。每逢节日,中国讲究的是索取,老人等着儿女的孝敬,孩子等着父母的施舍,成人呢,等着工作单位的节日福利,商家们笑容可掬的让着利好,其实也是为了更大的索取,整个社会都成了索取的社会。日子久了,大家都习以为常,成了思维定势了。然而这圣诞节呢,虽说是耶稣的诞生日,却是一个只送出的日子,大约是因为这小孩的诞生,人们去祝福衍生而来的吧。总之,就有白发苍苍的素不相识的老人们顶风冒雪,不辞寒苦,千里迢迢,挨家挨户的送祝福的礼品,把温暖、慈祥和博爱不分贵贱、不分贫富的送给每一个家庭。平等、博爱和送出自小就深深烙在小孩子们的心中,一代一代,生生不息。
中国的节却大约并不是这样的,虽说我们早有“礼轻情意重”的古训,但礼的轻重早成了人们衡量亲、疏、远、近的尺度。给位高者送礼,有巴结之意,得费尽脑筋选择礼品;给位卑者还礼,有施恩之嫌,沾沾乎有救世主之心;老人以礼品厚薄掂量儿女孝顺的程度,孩子们凭礼物的多寡,察长辈疼爱的深浅。整个节日,礼来礼去,无亲不走、无故不问,圈子锁定,唯利而行,也一代一代,生生不息。
圣诞感言,其实也没有什么“言”可“感”,添了些年岁,翻然有以上小悟,然而似乎已经离圣诞主题远了,还是就此搁笔吧。